Feedback details

(1.0)
Communication
Creativity
Critical thinking
Employability
Professionalism
Custom Questions
  • Q1 - Text short
    What notable qualities or skills did the student demonstrate throughout the project?
    Aparna demonstrated an ability to participate in the initial meeting, suggesting a baseline willingness to engage at the start of the project. However, her notable lack of communication and failure to provide updates or seek assistance throughout the process overshadowed any further skills or qualities, making it difficult to assess her overall contribution or capabilities effectively.
  • Q2 - Text short
    How did the student engage with stakeholders during the project?
    Aparna engaged with stakeholders minimally, limited to the initial meeting, and did not maintain any further communication throughout the project. Her lack of interaction—despite opportunities to connect—meant stakeholders received no updates, feedback, or insight into her progress or challenges, significantly hindering collaboration and support efforts.
  • Q3 - Text short
    Did the student effectively manage their time and meet project deadlines? If so, how? If not, what areas could they improve in?
    Aparna submitted her project, indicating she ultimately managed her time well enough to meet the final deadline. However, her lack of communication, missed meetings, and failure to respond to collaborative documents throughout the process suggest inconsistent time management and a need for improvement in staying engaged and updating stakeholders regularly to ensure smoother collaboration.
  • Learner feedback

    Individual endorsement
    Ai agents Planning Project planning Technical documentation Artificial intelligence Research Usability Management Automation Workflow management

    I can endorse Aparna for submitting her project by the deadline, demonstrating an ability to deliver under minimal oversight. However, her limited communication, missed meetings, and lack of updates to collaborative documents hindered teamwork, and I’d encourage her to engage more consistently with stakeholders to strengthen her skills and contributions in future projects.

    Working with Aparna was challenging due to her lack of communication beyond our initial meeting. Despite opportunities to connect, she did not reach out with updates, questions, or concerns, which prevented us from understanding any difficulties she might have encountered or offering support. The quality of her deliverables was difficult to assess given the absence of interaction, and this stood out negatively as it limited collaboration. I’d encourage her to engage more actively to enhance her learning and project outcomes.
    Ai agents Planning Project planning Technical documentation Artificial intelligence Research Usability Management Automation Workflow management
    Author
    Shawn McIntyre
    Employer
    Experience
    Level UP: February 2025
    Project
    AI Agents for Business Automation
    Created At
    April 7, 2025